Alternative treatments like massage, meditation, acupuncture are enhanced with the technique.Improvement of the physical and mental performance : It helps to focus, relax and connect dots and concentrate.The Om tuning fork with 136.1Hz frequency is the ultimate healing and relaxing solution.OM Tuning Fork 136.1 HZ Weighted – with Buddha Bead Base Green for Heart Chakra Diaphony : It is the use of tuning forks in the subtle bodies, energy fields and energy centers (aura and chakras ).The bones transmit the vibrations better than any other medium of the body. Osteophony : It uses the tuning forks on the articulations and any part of the skeleton.Son puncture : It utilizes the tuning forks on the acupuncture points, hand, and feet reflexology points, median points, Shiatsu points, spinal reflex points of the body.Nonweighted tuning forks: These do not have the weights attached and are to be listened to for comfort by adjusting fork to the patient’s ear.Weighted tuning forks: These forks have a weight connected to the end of the arm of the fork that gives more vibration to the body.The technique applies sound to the physical and subtle body to open the energetic pathways where the natural life force flows, facilitating homeostasis through which healing begins.
Tuning fork for healing utilizes the calibrated tuning forks to apply pressure or vibration by point stimulation in order to release tension and promote emotional stability. Level of evidence Level 3b.Sound healing therapy is the practice of using various aspects of music for the physical and mental health restoration and well being of the patient with the help of trained healing practitioners. It is recommended for audiologists to perform the simple AW test to verify incomplete or questionable audiograms that are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Conclusion Both AW and TFW tests are reasonably accurate in assessing patients with CHL. In addition, the kappa statistics revealed substantial agreements between the two tests and PTA (k =. At 512 Hz (or 500 Hz), the overall accuracy results of TFW and AW tests were 85.1% and 82.4%, respectively. Results At 256 Hz (or 250 Hz), the overall accuracy values of TFW and AW tests were 81.1% and 86.5%, respectively. TF and AW test results were then compared with the expected lateralization from the respective PTA results. For the AW test, the bone vibrator was placed in the middle of the forehead, where 250 and 500 Hz frequencies were tested. The TFW test was performed according to the established protocol at 256 and 512 Hz. Methods In this observational cross‐sectional study, 74 participants (aged 12‐67 years) with unilateral conductive hearing loss (CHL) or bilateral asymmetrical CHL were enrolled. The present study aimed to determine the accuracy and agreement between the AW and TFW tests compared to PTA. Nevertheless, AW and TFW tests' performance compared to pure‐tone audiometry (PTA) has yet to be studied. Compared to the tuning fork Weber (TFW) test, performing the audiometric Weber (AW) test offers many advantages. Abstract Objectives Weber test is typically conducted using tuning forks, but an audiometer can also be used for a similar purpose.
0 kommentar(er)
